On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:21:35AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > I would say something here about senseless duplication of effort, but > it's not likely to convince anybody. I guess that I am bised, but it seems to me that, at least, fvwm, fluxbox and icewm are not duplicate, and don't duplicate xfce/gnome/kde either. And dockapps based desktop don't duplicate big desktop either. I don't know WindowMaker, though. > Please, just pretend xdm doesn't exist. I personally am interested in having xdm maintained, since wdm is based on it. To be honest, I have asked the wdm maintainer to rebase on latest xdm, but he still hasn't done it. But in any case wdm suits my needs much better than gdm (at least starts infinitely faster). I agree that xdm itself is a bit too minimalistic, especially since there is no simple way to change the session if I recall well. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
