Le mardi 04 septembre 2007 à 16:01 -0500, David G. Mackay a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 16:08 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:00:15 -0500 > > "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Last I heard, Fedora was a derivative of RHEL, and perhaps early on > > > RH9. > > > > Then you've been sadly misinformed. Red Hat Enterprise Linux has > > always been built from either Red Hat Linux of the day, or Fedora. > > Never (that I am aware of) have we taken an existing RHEL and turned it > > into RHL or Fedora. > > No. I was thinking specifically of FC1. Since all of the succeeding > Fedora releases build on each other, they are all, in that sense derived > from RHEL and RH9. Of course, you could claim that everything for FC1 > was conjured into existence independently, which would give a whole new > meaning to "installation wizard". What Jess told you is FC1 = RHL10 The RHEL releases are branches of the RHL/FC/F trunk (once could say dead branches as they are rebased from the free line periodically), and Fedora is certainly not derived from them -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
