On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:59:08 -0500 "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The move to Centos or RHEL is due more to the switch from a > development phase to production. I simply want the longer life cycle. > > You seem to be saying that it's alright for Fedora to lack useful > features if the features are available in RHEL. That seems to make > Fedora's utility as an upstream provider to RHEL somewhat less. I'm saying that it's Ok for Fedora to abandon compatibility layers if there are other viable platforms in the Fedora universe that will support the required software. Fedora is about moving forward, not dragging behind. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
