On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 09:00 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:59:08 -0500 > "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The move to Centos or RHEL is due more to the switch from a > > development phase to production. I simply want the longer life cycle. > > > > You seem to be saying that it's alright for Fedora to lack useful > > features if the features are available in RHEL. That seems to make > > Fedora's utility as an upstream provider to RHEL somewhat less. > > I'm saying that it's Ok for Fedora to abandon compatibility layers if > there are other viable platforms in the Fedora universe that will > support the required software. Fedora is about moving forward, not > dragging behind. Why does this remind me of Pangloss in Candide? And, I have been rather forcefully told on this list that Fedora stands alone. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
