On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:00:15 -0500 "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 12:23 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:39:42 -0500 > > "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Why does this remind me of Pangloss in Candide? > > > > I have no idea what that means. > > I see that you've been updated on that already. > > > > And, I have been > > > rather forcefully told on this list that Fedora stands alone. > > > > Perhaps it's a matter of context. It's no mystery that RHEL is a > > derivative of Fedora, and that CentOS is a free rebuild of RHEL. To > > Last I heard, Fedora was a derivative of RHEL, and perhaps early on RH9. > As I understand it, Red Hat expects Fedora to be an upstream provider. > One of several. Um, no. In fact, these days it's often the opposite. RHEL is a derivative of Fedora. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
