On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 09:49 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:45:41 -0400 > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I understand - I was just thinking that a base definition of > > libraries + applications that we need for a minimal chroot has the > > virtue of surviving independent of package renaming. > > Yes, I see the value too, although it doesn't get us any closer to > doing away with file deps :/ One easy way to implement this would be to collect a list of tools those tools being wanted and to generate a list of those packages providing them "buildgroups.xml". An alternative would be to implement an rpm which simply pulls all these tools in ;) Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
