Re: util-linux missing from build root

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:04:52 -0400
seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This doesn't sound terrible to me. If we did provide a list of library
> requirements and application requirements that we define as minimal it
> would be easy to pass that list to yum to resolve and install.
> 
> something to think about, anyway.

Can it be expressed as a comps group though?  Does yum comps module
handle that?

Also keep in mind that part of having the minimal buildroot was so that
when people rebuild packages on their own, they didn't have to hunt
down why their package didn't build right due to silent missing
BuildRequires.  That means we start with very little assumptions and
use the BuildRequires to build up exactly what we want around when this
package is built.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux