On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:22:04 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > It sounds really bad that the old plans of a minimal build environment > > find such an unfortunate end here. > > Not sure what you mean. What I mean is that suddenly it seems we're back to BuildRequiring lots of hardcoded package names or file paths for low-level tools that should _just be there_ in a core environment without the need to BR them. Seeing the suggestion that packagers should BR util-linux-ng triggered my reaction. I feel that if more BR like that are needed "now", we will see more path-based BR, too, and BR for fundamental tools like cpp, gcc, gcc-c++, rpm-build, /bin/sh, ... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
