-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:30:41 +0530 > Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Of course but derivative distributions and even respins would want is >> the ability to point to Fedora for the source and I think we can >> accommodate that requirement without any additional liability. > > I don't think we can, as we'd have to start distributing under 3b, for > every single binary we ship. That's going to piss off a lot of mirrors > if they have to carry all copies of the source of every update we've > ever released for (at least) three years. > Do they have to be in the same tree on all mirrors, or can the master download server (say http://download.fedora.redhat.com) have a larger tree then the master server the mirrors sync from? - -- Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen - -kanarip - -- http://www.kanarip.com/ RHCE, LPIC-2, MCP, CCNA C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258 F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG1tBlKN6f2pNCvwgRAigQAKCT4lr+wbSaOcT6ppC78Mx5WwbsUwCeM/vK nourPxinHt9Hx+rhByn6HQA= =D9uX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
