-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:30:41 +0530 > Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Of course but derivative distributions and even respins would want is >> the ability to point to Fedora for the source and I think we can >> accommodate that requirement without any additional liability. > > I don't think we can, as we'd have to start distributing under 3b, for > every single binary we ship. That's going to piss off a lot of mirrors > if they have to carry all copies of the source of every update we've > ever released for (at least) three years. > In addition (I forgot to mention that in my previous message), 3b requires you distribute the sources (along with the binaries, for 3 years from the moment the offer for the sources is made) using a common method; that requirement doesn't include any mirrors also carrying the sources or entire tree of binaries; or that you provide instructions on how to get the source code (3c can pass those instructions along) and you may not charge any more then it costs you (example burning and shipping the media). - -- Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen - -kanarip - -- http://www.kanarip.com/ RHCE, LPIC-2, MCP, CCNA C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258 F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG1tEgKN6f2pNCvwgRAvnwAKDMbl7Y45xEbqXJGaJKbheSMiBIVwCffh/O h3NcqEH9xjk0tEU2Oh5wpsw= =QSPQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
