On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 13:32 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 10:00 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > Basically, you should be able to vote if you are under FESCo's > > authority. You should not be able to vote if you are not. > > Agreed. So, we need to identify the people in QA, rel-eng, and features > groups, that aren't currently in the cvsextras, and modify our election > software to give them the necessary permissions to vote. Right? > Basically yes. If we just identify groups for these areas we can add those easily enough. I see these groups in the account system which might be relevant: releng securit_respons qa-admin I don't think this is going to adequately cover everyone, though. f13, does releng include all the release engineers that should have voting privileges? wwoods, poelcat do we need to add a tracker group to the Account System for QA and features? Should the security response team fall under QA or have its own group? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
