On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 09:14 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 6/20/07, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No it's not. Co-maintainers. > > Do we have examples of co-maintainers who are themselves not a primary > package maintainer who has gone through the package submission and > sponsorship process? I'd love to know that such a precedent exists. This is something we've talked about doing, but I'm not aware of it being actually done yet. This was one of the reasons that acl's were implemented, so we could make it easier for new folks to join and limit the amount of damage they could potentially cause. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
