On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 22:37 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 20:10 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:33 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > > > I do not maintain any packages, but participate in the Fedora. Can I still run? > > > > > Not according to the policy. I think the policy deserves to be examined > > since FESCo is no longer strictly about packaging but about making all > > technical decisions WRT Fedora. I'm undecided whether it should be > > updated this close to the election. Does anyone else have thoughts on > > this? > > It's not too close to the elections to change this detail in this > direction. Too close to restrict the pool of contenders, but not too > close to expand it. > > +1 to FESCo candidates being anyone with an FAS account. +1 to allowing more folks be eligible for FESCo, though I'm not sure if anyone with a FAS account is the right criteria. Some of the things that FESCo will most likely be overseeing in the future are things like New Features (which John will be leading), QA, and Release Engineering. It makes sense we should make the folks involved with these aspects of the project also eligible to be part of FESCo. Thanks, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
