On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:10 +0200, Stefan Held wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 10.06.2007, 09:18 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > > > We are not going to remove your ability to configure grub in whatever > > way you want, in exactly the same way as you always could. > > Did i say something else? > > > > And therefore it would be > > > great to have a small fedora-logo-grub.fc8.rpm which does not depend on > > > 1000 rpms afterwards. > > > > Jeremy already stated why we can't do that. > > Come on. Somebody who set up koji, mock and other stuff for building his > own derivate of Fedora should be afraid about 3 lines in the > fedora-logos.spec file which declares a sub package should be made for > the grub grafic? > > This doesn't sound like why we "can't" do that. As i said allready all > what i am asking for is: > > generate a grub-logo-rpm which does not need half of the base rpms. > > Is that really so hard to do? > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00519.html > > Read this mail again and decide for yourself why this is a good plan. > > Please. I ever thought this is the place for improvements of Fedora. > There is one. Take the chance to do it. Maybe we come to a minimal > install without 250Mb not needed stuff on the harddisk. > You are not listening. No matter how easy it is to split off a subpackage, legal has asked us to keep all trademarked images in a single package. Anyway, there is still an easy way out; just don't use trademarked images in grub. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
