Re: Unwanted RPM dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > We have something of a mandate to keep all the trademarked content in one 
> > package, fedora-logos.
> 
> What about a fedora-logos-grub subpackage? It's easy to identify where it comes 
> from, and derivative distros will need to patch fedora-logos at SRPM level 
> anyway, so there's practically no chance they'd miss the subpackage (which 
> would be built from the same SRPM).

fedora-logos is mentioned by name in the EULA. I'd prefer to keep it simple
(especially if we're deprecating the theming of grub)

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux