Re: Unwanted RPM dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> 
> On Monday 04 June 2007 14:17:11 Stefan Held wrote:
> > Would the solution with isolated grub graphics harm anyone?
> 
> We have something of a mandate to keep all the trademarked content in one 
> package, fedora-logos.

What about a fedora-logos-grub subpackage? It's easy to identify where it comes 
from, and derivative distros will need to patch fedora-logos at SRPM level 
anyway, so there's practically no chance they'd miss the subpackage (which 
would be built from the same SRPM).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux