Am Sonntag, den 10.06.2007, 09:18 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > We are not going to remove your ability to configure grub in whatever > way you want, in exactly the same way as you always could. Did i say something else? > > And therefore it would be > > great to have a small fedora-logo-grub.fc8.rpm which does not depend on > > 1000 rpms afterwards. > > Jeremy already stated why we can't do that. Come on. Somebody who set up koji, mock and other stuff for building his own derivate of Fedora should be afraid about 3 lines in the fedora-logos.spec file which declares a sub package should be made for the grub grafic? This doesn't sound like why we "can't" do that. As i said allready all what i am asking for is: generate a grub-logo-rpm which does not need half of the base rpms. Is that really so hard to do? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00519.html Read this mail again and decide for yourself why this is a good plan. Please. I ever thought this is the place for improvements of Fedora. There is one. Take the chance to do it. Maybe we come to a minimal install without 250Mb not needed stuff on the harddisk. Greetings Stefan. (I will stop this now and file a RFE in Bugzilla) -- Stefan Held VI has only 2 Modes: obi unixkiste org The first one is for beeping all the time, FreeNode: foo_bar the second destroys the text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora Ambassador: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StefanHeld --------------------------------------------------------------------------- perl -e'map{print pack c,($|++?1:13)+ord,select$,,$,,$,,$|}split//,ESEL.$/' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG-Keyprint = 75C0 F029 CA71 F061 6C07 0640 38F7 E5F9 4EA5 A385
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
