On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:08 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > Till Maas wrote: > > On So Juni 10 2007, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > > >> I think the ugpradeability is a factor, but I think you've got it wrong. > >> If every time someone built a change into rawhide, they also pushed a > >> fix to F-7 for example because there's a new version of <insert popular > >> app here>, then what's the point in upgrading to F-8 when that's ready? > > > > Holding back updates only to make a new release interesting is not a good > > reason imho. But there are sometimes technical reasons, why updates are done > > from one release to another. The other way round, when bugs are not fixed > > with a new update in a current release but left open until the release is end > > of life is much more annoying imho and causes me more problems than often > > updates. > > But there are always bugs. Are we going to fix every one? We need to > fix the important ones. I don't think that pulling in every latest > version is important enough against a release. +1. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
