On So Juni 10 2007, Christopher Aillon wrote: > I think the ugpradeability is a factor, but I think you've got it wrong. > If every time someone built a change into rawhide, they also pushed a > fix to F-7 for example because there's a new version of <insert popular > app here>, then what's the point in upgrading to F-8 when that's ready? Holding back updates only to make a new release interesting is not a good reason imho. But there are sometimes technical reasons, why updates are done from one release to another. The other way round, when bugs are not fixed with a new update in a current release but left open until the release is end of life is much more annoying imho and causes me more problems than often updates. > Most extras packages have the same version across the board. I > understand the pros of doing that, but do we really want to turn each > Fedora release into the next RHL 7.3? What was the property of RHL 7.3 you are refering to? I did not use Redhat then, so I do not know. Regards, Till -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
