On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jindrich Novy wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > >> Seems a bit odd: > >> tetex-doc x86_64 > > > > Yup, this is odd. > > > > The TeXLive 2007 packages which are now under review: > > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/229180 > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/242416 > > > > and splits the TeXLive into two parts just for this reason (the largest > > part -> texmf tree, docs) is noarch and only the binary part, which is > > arch specific, is packaged separately thanks to the better design of > > TeXLive. > > > > The packages are now in a ready-to-use(tm) state and needs review, > > please help with it so that we can get rid of TeTeX soon. > > > > You should update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive > and added it to Fedora 8 feature list. Updated. -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
