On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:26:28PM -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Hello, > > could we change the list configuration not to munge > the Reply-To header, so that when we "Reply All", we > actually don't loose the Cc list? Why do you lose the Cc list with reply *all*? At least my mutt doesn't, so perhaps its a MUA issue? > The way it's configured now makes it very difficult to > notice own's replies in threads. Why? the From: field doesn't change, you're still the author of your reply. > Most high-traffic lists I subscribe are configured this > way: linux-kernel, xorg-devel, gcc, gcc-patches, xcb, > mesa, dri, uclinux-dev... But some of these lists you mention are not subscriber only. If you allow non-members to post (even if moderated) then you can't use Reply-To. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp9gV0nTNZJA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
