Jindrich Novy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> Seems a bit odd: >> tetex-doc x86_64 > > Yup, this is odd. > > The TeXLive 2007 packages which are now under review: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/229180 > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/242416 > > and splits the TeXLive into two parts just for this reason (the largest > part -> texmf tree, docs) is noarch and only the binary part, which is > arch specific, is packaged separately thanks to the better design of > TeXLive. > > The packages are now in a ready-to-use(tm) state and needs review, > please help with it so that we can get rid of TeTeX soon. > > Thanks, > Jindrich > OK, I'll try out the texlive packages. Does this obsolete tetex? Coexist? IOW, how should I install this on a current FC7 system that already has tetex? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
