Re: tetex-doc is not noarch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Seems a bit odd:
 tetex-doc               x86_64

Yup, this is odd.

The TeXLive 2007 packages which are now under review:

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/229180
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/242416

and splits the TeXLive into two parts just for this reason (the largest
part -> texmf tree, docs) is noarch and only the binary part, which is
arch specific, is packaged separately thanks to the better design of
TeXLive.

The packages are now in a ready-to-use(tm) state and needs review,
please help with it so that we can get rid of TeTeX soon.


You should update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive and added it to Fedora 8 feature list.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux