Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
. The Fedora KDE Live CD is specifically crafted to showcase
KDE, whilst the Fedora Live CD is specifically crafted to put Fedora's best
foot forward in a reasonable usable desktop that will fit on a CD. Again, it
is not a "GNOME" LiveCD by any means. Many parts of it are not gnome,
especially areas like the browser. A Fedora GNOME LiveCD could be crafted
that showcases a pure GNOME desktop, like the KDE LiveCD.
I already told you. This reasoning is flawed. The KDE live cd is not one
to showcase a "pure KDE desktop" just the GNOME live cd. It has Firefox
as the default browser just like GNOME. It has dozens of GNOME
components. It might even have Evolution.
Huh? Have you actually even tried the KDE live image? Default browser
is konqueror, default mail client is kmail, ... evolution and firefox
aren't even included.
I believe one of the KDE live releases did include Firefox. I haven't
tried the latest test release yet. I didn't claim that is has Evolution
now. Just that it is a possibility from the discussions that happened.
Gparted is going to be included in the final release. Fundamentally
there is no goal of purity of desktop environment which was my main point.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
