On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > . The Fedora KDE Live CD is specifically crafted to showcase > > KDE, whilst the Fedora Live CD is specifically crafted to put Fedora's best > > foot forward in a reasonable usable desktop that will fit on a CD. Again, it > > is not a "GNOME" LiveCD by any means. Many parts of it are not gnome, > > especially areas like the browser. A Fedora GNOME LiveCD could be crafted > > that showcases a pure GNOME desktop, like the KDE LiveCD. > > I already told you. This reasoning is flawed. The KDE live cd is not one > to showcase a "pure KDE desktop" just the GNOME live cd. It has Firefox > as the default browser just like GNOME. It has dozens of GNOME > components. It might even have Evolution. Huh? Have you actually even tried the KDE live image? Default browser is konqueror, default mail client is kmail, ... evolution and firefox aren't even included. Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list