On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:55:51AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > . The Fedora KDE Live CD is specifically crafted to showcase > > > KDE, whilst the Fedora Live CD is specifically crafted to put Fedora's best > > > foot forward in a reasonable usable desktop that will fit on a CD. Again, it > > > is not a "GNOME" LiveCD by any means. Many parts of it are not gnome, > > > especially areas like the browser. A Fedora GNOME LiveCD could be crafted > > > that showcases a pure GNOME desktop, like the KDE LiveCD. > > > > I already told you. This reasoning is flawed. The KDE live cd is not one > > to showcase a "pure KDE desktop" just the GNOME live cd. It has Firefox > > as the default browser just like GNOME. It has dozens of GNOME > > components. It might even have Evolution. > > Huh? Have you actually even tried the KDE live image? Default browser > is konqueror, default mail client is kmail, ... evolution and firefox > aren't even included. I think many people will miss firefox. I know there might be space constraints, but moving then to bigger images will be the only item we could do to generate more generic images that a broader set of people can use. Just look at the size of a default install, it has really grown pretty huge over the years. regards, Florian La Roche -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
