Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 20 April 2007 11:41:24 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> That section is titled "Minor release bumps for old branches" -- but
>> this was devel afaics.
>> BTW, I curios, too, why it should have been "1.%{?dist}.1" (and yes, I
>> fully understand that 1.%{?dist}.1 makes sense in old branches).
> Whoops, didn't realize this was the devel branch. If that's the case, (the
> devel branch) it should have gone from 1%{?dist} to simply 2%{?dist}. No
> need to introduce further decimal points there.
Well, I'd do it like that, too. But on the other hand: isn't this up to
the decision of the packager if he wants to introduce a further decimal
point? I assume some people want to say "foo-1.0-1* are all based on the
same spec logic"
CU
thl
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
