Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 20 April 2007 11:02:28 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>> On 4/20/07, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> --- uqm.spec 27 Jan 2007 02:33:09 -0000 1.12
>>>> +++ uqm.spec 20 Apr 2007 01:32:41 -0000 1.13
>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>> Name: uqm
>>>> Version: 0.6.2
>>>> -Release: 1%{?dist}
>>>> +Release: 1.1%{?dist}
>>> Should have been
>>>
>>> Release: 1.%{?dist}.1
>> Oh? News to me. Is that a new guideline?
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-378ec5e6a73d5425d55c115ff5d0fa5f5094dcba
That section is titled "Minor release bumps for old branches" -- but
this was devel afaics.
BTW, I curios, too, why it should have been "1.%{?dist}.1" (and yes, I
fully understand that 1.%{?dist}.1 makes sense in old branches).
CU
thl
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
