On Friday 20 April 2007 11:02:28 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On 4/20/07, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- uqm.spec 27 Jan 2007 02:33:09 -0000 1.12 > > > +++ uqm.spec 20 Apr 2007 01:32:41 -0000 1.13 > > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > > Name: uqm > > > Version: 0.6.2 > > > -Release: 1%{?dist} > > > +Release: 1.1%{?dist} > > > > Should have been > > > > Release: 1.%{?dist}.1 > > Oh? News to me. Is that a new guideline? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-378ec5e6a73d5425d55c115ff5d0fa5f5094dcba -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpGKSOoQWMxX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list