On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:41:24 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Jesse Keating schrieb:
> > On Friday 20 April 2007 11:02:28 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> >> On 4/20/07, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> --- uqm.spec 27 Jan 2007 02:33:09 -0000 1.12
> >>>> +++ uqm.spec 20 Apr 2007 01:32:41 -0000 1.13
> >>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >>>> Name: uqm
> >>>> Version: 0.6.2
> >>>> -Release: 1%{?dist}
> >>>> +Release: 1.1%{?dist}
> >>> Should have been
> >>>
> >>> Release: 1.%{?dist}.1
> >> Oh? News to me. Is that a new guideline?
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-378ec5e6a73d5425d55c115ff5d0fa5f5094dcba
>
> That section is titled "Minor release bumps for old branches" -- but
> this was devel afaics.
>
> BTW, I curios, too, why it should have been "1.%{?dist}.1" (and yes, I
> fully understand that 1.%{?dist}.1 makes sense in old branches).
OMG, I made typo. Should have read: 1%{?dist}.1
And yes, 2%{?dist} would have been fine, too.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
