>>>>> "MM" == Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: MM> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:01:27PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >> > How bad of a performance problem is it to have a bunch of bugs in >> CLOSED > or NEEDINFO state against devel? Does it matter? Searching >> would suck if you include these states. Also it's not helpful if MM> Things which stay in needinfo too long should get closed as MM> INSUFFICIENT_DATA. When a release is obsoleted, all bugs in the MM> devel version which were closed in the timeframe of that release MM> could be moved to the Fedora Pasture as well. I have bug 172776 stuck in NEEDINFO. It should be easy to reproduce and it has been with us since FC4 (still there in FC6; I don't know if it is in FC7). All needed information should be there; I have received no further requests for information since I answered on the 27th of January. If NEEDINFO bugs are automatically closed, we will lose bug reports like that one. /Benny -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
