Re: actually, I'm serious: forbid bugzilla filing against FC4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:12:55PM +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> I have bug 172776 stuck in NEEDINFO. It should be easy to reproduce
> and it has been with us since FC4 (still there in FC6; I don't know if
> it is in FC7). All needed information should be there; I have received
> no further requests for information since I answered on the 27th of
> January.
> If NEEDINFO bugs are automatically closed, we will lose bug reports
> like that one.

Why was it left in NEEDINFO state when the information was provided?


In any case, the auto-close message should say something like "please reopen
in case etc. etc. etc.". And of course closed bugs aren't deleted, just
closed (with a specific state, INSUFFICIENT_DATA, which indicates that the
issue wasn't actually resolved).

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux