Re: actually, I'm serious: forbid bugzilla filing against FC4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 03:42:58PM -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> They're Thursdays at 1600UTC (currently Noon EDT). Check out the
> #fedora-meeting schedule page:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/FedoraMeetingChannel

Thanks.

> As for the Grand Future of bugzilla, I think we were talking about
> mass-moving bugs from 'devel' to (say) 'f8-pre' when F8 gets released.

The thing I'm concerned about here is that ending up with a whole slew of
"f#-pre" releases doesn't seem much better than the current situation.
That's why I suggested marking them needinfo and tagging them with the
version they were originally filed against via a keyword or some other flag.

How bad of a performance problem is it to have a bunch of bugs in CLOSED or
NEEDINFO state against devel? Does it matter?




-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux