On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 12:35 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 14:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:05:24 +0100 > >> mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx (Michael Schwendt) wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:23:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >>>> - Fix problems that they cause if mistakes are made and they can't > >>>> figure out how to fix them. > >>> You know this has become impossible with the ACLs. > >> For now, for new packages, yes. For existing extras packages they > >> should still be open to anyone unless the maintainer has placed a > >> pkg.acl in place. > > > > == severe regression, rendering the sponsorship model useless and non-functional > > > > => fix it ASAP (now) or revert this change. > > Existing packages do not have ACL's by default. This is the same as > before. In other words, it is not a regression. Sponsors can not intervene into newly added packages! => this ACL crap has rendered the sponsorship model NON-APPLICABLE This is the REGRESSION. I for one don't see any possibility to sponsor anybody anymore and don't see any possibility anymore to approve packages having been submitted by new-comers. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
