Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 14:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:05:24 +0100
> mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx (Michael Schwendt) wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:23:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

> > > - Fix problems that they cause if mistakes are made and they can't
> > > figure out how to fix them. 
> > 
> > You know this has become impossible with the ACLs. 
> 
> For now, for new packages, yes. For existing extras packages they
> should still be open to anyone unless the maintainer has placed a
> pkg.acl in place. 

== severe regression, rendering the sponsorship model useless and non-functional

=> fix it ASAP (now) or revert this change.

Ralf




-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux