Re: Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 14:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:05:24 +0100
mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx (Michael Schwendt) wrote:

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:23:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

- Fix problems that they cause if mistakes are made and they can't
figure out how to fix them.
You know this has become impossible with the ACLs.
For now, for new packages, yes. For existing extras packages they
should still be open to anyone unless the maintainer has placed a
pkg.acl in place.

== severe regression, rendering the sponsorship model useless and non-functional

=> fix it ASAP (now) or revert this change.

Existing packages do not have ACL's by default. This is the same as before. In other words, it is not a regression.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux