On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:36, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > Of course. Things all have to add up. > Still. is this even something we want for Fedora? It's quite possible > that we just don't want to do it, for any number of the problems brought > up throughout this thread. Then let's declare LTS out-of-scope for > Fedora and move along. Otherwise, lets see what *could* be done about it. I think many of us have declared this out of scope for Fedora, you just haven't moved on (: -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp4WfLU9aO3o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
