On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 08:05 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:36, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > > Of course. Things all have to add up. > > Still. is this even something we want for Fedora? It's quite possible > > that we just don't want to do it, for any number of the problems brought > > up throughout this thread. Then let's declare LTS out-of-scope for > > Fedora and move along. Otherwise, lets see what *could* be done about it. > > I think many of us have declared this out of scope for Fedora, you just > haven't moved on (: +1 /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
