Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
Right now it may be the same thing, but if Fedora continues to evolve
to something *larger* than a bleeding edge RHEL/CentOS, as there's
been much talk about recently (realistically or not?!?), it would be
great to have something to handle these cases with a real Fedora.
I am not sure what bleeding edge RHEL means. Do you believe Fedora can
work out a even longer lifecycle? What exactly are the benefits to users?
By bleeding edge RHEL I mean what will essentially be snapshot and
matured into RHEL and later CentOS.
I completely agree that right now, for my servers, RHEL/CentOS is
probably exactly what I'm looking for. And that's also why most my
servers actually run RHEL today.
Also, this may not be doable (right now or ever), I'm mentioning it as
something to be *considered*, because there are enough of users out
there who could do with longer periods of active maintenance for their
servers.
Question though is about not just enough users but enough contributors
to do the work.
Of course. Things all have to add up.
Still. is this even something we want for Fedora? It's quite possible
that we just don't want to do it, for any number of the problems brought
up throughout this thread. Then let's declare LTS out-of-scope for
Fedora and move along. Otherwise, lets see what *could* be done about it. :)
/Thomas
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
