On Tuesday 16 January 2007 17:26, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > This is why I suggested an more stable (in terms of changes) LTS spin, > perhaps, for every 2-4 normal Fedora releases, to provide a Fedora that > could actually be used in these situations. (i know it is the way it is > for a reason, so this is in no way an attempt to bad-mouth Fedora as it > is. It's meant as a suggestion for further improvement). I also realize > that providing such a release would be very much like RHEL and CentOS, > but I got the impression that we were starting to open up and become > more than the fast-rolling testbed distro that will be snapshot and > stabilized into RHEL, in which case something like this could help us to > reach more users/uses for Fedora. So every 2 to 4 releases of Fedora, call something a LTS release, do more QA and different update styles for it, support it for a long time, and market it as the Fedora for production use. Wait, how is this _not_ RHEL/CentOS? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp2Ur9fD0ri0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
