On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 08:12 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > >> You say this as if it's a good thing, I see this as another fact that > >> KDE isn't really designed for the mass userbase. How in gods green > >> earth is somebody supposed to look at a KDE menu and know that > >> Konqueror is for browsing the web? That "Kate" is for writing text > >> files? > > > > So why havent we fixed up the menu to be meaningful? > > KDE doesn't *need* fixing, it isn't broke. Konq already (can) display as > Konqueror Web Browswer > IMO, the fact that other apps (and gnome) in Fedora does this > differently by abusing > Name= > vs. > GenericName= > in .desktip files is bad/wrong/silly/bug. As long as I have any input > on it, > * KDE will not go down that road, ever. > * Packaging Guidelines should be updated highlight/avoid such abuse > Rex, not every design decision made by the desktop team can be reverted via the packaging guidelines. Committees work best if they don't try to grab too much power. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
