When I posted the first 3 options I didn't realise that option 4 was going to be possible. If it is then I agree: Option 4. On 17/10/06, Steve Barnhart <stb52988@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree with option 4. Follow the current method and everyone quit jumping on every renaming and forking bandwagon Debian seems to be creating these days. I can't stand when people make a big deal over little things. The license and issues haven't changed. On 10/16/06, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:31 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > Michael Wiktowy wrote: > > > Are those pictures of "Iceweasles" clogging up the Internets "series of > > > tubes" I have been hearing so much about? ;] > > > > No. They are hedgehogs. In tubes. > > "Tubehog" would just be _the_ descriptive name for a widespread web > browser. > > Nils > -- > Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 > PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
