Re: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em Sex, 2006-10-13 às 17:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram escreveu:
> >> I can agree with that. However, it is my understanding that what truly
> >> makes up the software, the code, is still "free".
> > 
> > It's not; you cannot modify it.
> 
> Of course you can. Nobody would be able to fork it if it wasnt Free 
> software. The mozilla codebase is trilicensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL where 
> all there of them are Free software licenses. The current issues are 
> related to trademarks and not copyright licenses.
> 

I'd like to clarify that Debian will no longer ship Firefox because the
license of the Firefox logo is not free, so the core of this issue is a
copyright license, not trademark. If Mozilla relicensed the logo under
the GPL/LGPL/MPL like the rest of the Firefox source code then Debian
would be able to ship the package with the original logo in its main
repository. As it is, they can ship it in non-free if one of the Debian
developers feel like doing it.

Mozilla doesn't have to make the Firefox logo non-free to protect its
trademark. I know the Debian people even suggested this to Mozilla, but
they refused to relicense it anyway.

Cheers,
Evandro

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux