I agree with option 4. Follow the current method and everyone quit
jumping on every renaming and forking bandwagon Debian seems to be
creating these days. I can't stand when people make a big deal over
little things. The license and issues haven't changed.
On 10/16/06, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:31 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> > Are those pictures of "Iceweasles" clogging up the Internets "series of
> > tubes" I have been hearing so much about? ;]
>
> No. They are hedgehogs. In tubes.
"Tubehog" would just be _the_ descriptive name for a widespread web
browser.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Steve
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
