Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64 (benchmarks included)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:15:46AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:10:22PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> > I did same benchmarks using flops.c (attached) the results are attached > > to it seems that
 >  > -march=k8 -mtune=k8 -m32 is the fastes but not by much ...

Additionally, whilst you found these flags speed things up
slightly on AMD systems, it may have a noticable detrimental
impact on Intel systems, and shipping multiple sets of binaries
for a negligable speedup doesn't make a lot of sense.

this might be true but unfortunatelly I don't have a system to test (only dc opteron running FC5 and amd64 3000+ running rawhide)
 >  > the last one (-m64) is weird (much slower!!) no -OX was used.

When run in 32bit, this is doubling the amount of loads/stores used,
so little wonder it's slower.
what do you mean by "when run in 32bit" ? the resulting binary was a x86_64 one ??
		Dave


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux