Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <44B735F1.7070806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152861452.14587.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44B7507A.2050601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152864966.3159.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20060714T110240-512@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152870075.3159.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44B7688B.2040407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152872232.3159.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Arjan van de Ven <arjan <at> fenrus.demon.nl> writes:
> > >> What about -ftree-vectorize? 
> > ok but why isn't it enabled on x86_64 (for 64bit apps)
> perhaps because it's default enabled in -O2 ?

No it isn't, because it's still considered experimental by GCC developers. This 
is probably also the reason why it isn't in the RPM_OPT_FLAGS. :-)

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64 (benchmarks included)
  - From: dragoran

References:
- Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: dragoran
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: Paul Howarth
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: dragoran
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: dragoran
- Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
  - From: Arjan van de Ven

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel vulnerability
Next by Date: Re: Kernel vulnerability
Previous by thread: Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64
Next by thread: Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64 (benchmarks included)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]