Re: Changing CFLAGS for i386 packages on x86_64 (benchmarks included)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:10:22PM +0200, dragoran wrote:
> I did same benchmarks using flops.c (attached) the results are attached > to it seems that
 > -march=k8 -mtune=k8 -m32 is the fastes but not by much ...
 > the last one (-m64) is weird (much slower!!) no -OX was used.

If you were running a recent kernel from rawhide, you may want
to re-run these tests, as there was an fpu optimisation in there
that may have been responsible for spurious sigfpe's that some
apps have been getting. If that patch was to blame, then it's
possible there may have been other side-effects.

I have run this benchmarks on my FC5 box I can my rawhide box later if this helps fixing this bug...
Todays rawhide has it reverted.

		Dave


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux