Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
What's wrong with GPL programs using the Mozilla implementation?
Last time I checked NSS was totally GPL compatible.
mozilla-nss requires mozilla-nspr. libnss3.so also pulls in
libpthread.so. Those are pretty heavy requirements for SSL.
Yuk... I'm totally sick of this proliferation of portable
runtimes which usually turn out to be incompatible with each
other (license-wise or just because of conflicting definitions
and types). To say nothing about the performance cost of adding
a useless layer.
We have APR, NSPR, glib, QtCore, libiberty, and a myriad of
others.
What's wrong with POSIX + SUSv3 and their friends? All modern
OSes support them by now and there are even good implementations
for Windows.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
