Re: Future Fedora Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David <david.jamison1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments.  Just a few points and comments.

[...]

> To me this is bang on message.  My vote would be to have the initial
> install go either one of two ways.
> 
> a. As previously mentioned design Anaconda to have hardware detection
> built in and install accordingly.  I suppose the issue here might be
> achieving 100% detection of hardware.

Would be nice. But then again, the people I know with "limited hardware"
are just in for /very/ personalized installations (i.e., setting up a
router, firewall, file server, print server, ...)

> b. If it were possible move the main distro down to 1 disc per the
> second option above and then YUM everything else.  This Im guessing
> presupposes users have access to a reasonably fast internet connection
> and some knowledge of thier requirements.

Most people around here don't have "reasonably fast internet
connections"...
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux