Re: aiglx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Isn't Red Hat forking the accelerated GL community by working on AIGLX instead of Xgl?  It seems like Xgl is to AIGLX as SELinux is to AppArmor.

It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big tent and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for accelereated GL.

Benjy

On 3/1/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vitor Domingos wrote:

> Is AIGLX going to appear on FC5? I've test it with ATI RADEON 7000,
> with all the hacks that's on the wiki page, and it's too dam slow....
>
Some of the pieces are already integrated. See the section on technical
details for the current status.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RenderingProject/aiglx.  Since the
features are not enabled by default, yet performance shouldnt be much of
a concern for FC5. Reports with hardware details and benchmarks would be
quite useful to fine tune it I guess.


--
Rahul



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux